I am an advanced user, so don't baby it for me. Maybe I'm just brain farting, but I can't seem to do this with the GUI. I could program some lengthy array sorting and re-organizing to do it, but there has to be another way.
Quick version of problem: Given a table of 100 rows, only select 10 rows and sort those 10 alphabetically while leaving the other 90 exactly where/as they are.
Detailed Issue:
C1 - C2
aa - bc
ab - bb
ac - bd
ad -
ae - bb
af -
ag - bb
I have the above two columns. Column 1 has names in alphabetical order, and column 2 has an identifier or Nothing. Very basic. I want the outcome to be the following:
C1 - C2
aa - bc
ab - bb
ac - bd
ae - bb
ag - bb
ad -
af -
I want column 1 sorted alphabetically grouped with column 2 data, so the top half of the table has alphabetical (A-Z) with data in column 2, then the bottom half has alphabetical (A-Z again) data with no data in column 2. With my logic, I should be able to sort Column 2, which temporarily makes it alphabetical and ignores column 1.... then I select ONLY the data in Column 1 from row 1 to row countCol2Rows, and sort that selection alphabetically. However... when I sort just that selection alphabetically, the entire "active range" is sorted. It should all be one table, I can't make this two tables.
Bookmarks