Depends on how you look at it. It's true that the current error message,
stictly speaking, does cover hitting the argument number limit. But if you
are not aware of the limit to begin with, as in my case, you waste a lot of
time counting arguments, etc, trying to figure out what's wrong, when a
simple message saying you've hit the limit would have been infinitely more
helpful. Luckily I have enough previous programming experience that it
occured to me that there may be a limit.

"Myrna Larson" wrote:

> >it just says you are trying to pass too many arguments for
> >the function, instead of you've hit the limit.
>
> There's a difference there?
>