Golf scorecard again

> .. made to work if the h/cap were variable ..

Thought variable handicaps (besides variable par and stroke indexes) was
already catered for in the suggested formulas, no? (Based, of course, on a
best effort interp of the complexities posed by a non-golfer <g>)

In the sample file provided, in Sheet1, try inputting other handicaps (but
with the same dummy scores for easy comparison) on subsequent rows 7 - 10
(I've pre-loaded the formulas to row10). Also keep the other 2 variables,
par and the stroke indexes unchanged to comparison. Check whether the
formula returns are as expected for a couple of test h/cap cases. Try it and
post back.
--
Rgds
Max
xl 97
---
GMT+8, 1° 22' N 103° 45' E
xdemechanik <at>yahoo<dot>com
----
"kevhatch" <kevhatch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A8BFFA9E-32A3-44D1-A137-011868F321A7@microsoft.com...
> Thx Max,
> That works great with a 28 handicap. Is there a way it can be , as they
can change for each player from time to
> time?
>
> Players handicap of:
> 1 to 18 allowed 1stroke only on stroke index holes corresponding to their
> h/cap.
> i.e. player h/cap of 3 allowed one stroke on holes of s/index 1 - 3 etc.
>
> Players handicap of:
> 19 to 28 allowed 1 stroke on all 18 holes, in addition to 1 extra stroke
on
> each of the hardest holes corresponding to their h/cap.
> i.e. player h/cap of 22 allowed one stroke for each hole plus one extra
> stroke on holes of s/index 1 - 4 etc.
> Thx again

Typo in line:
> .. Also keep the other 2 variables, par and the stroke indexes
> unchanged to comparison...

2nd part should read:
> unchanged to aid comparison...

--
Rgds
Max
xl 97
---
GMT+8, 1° 22' N 103° 45' E
xdemechanik <at>yahoo<dot>com
----

ok max, thx. sorry to be a pain.
I have applied and tested the formula and found a few discrepencies.
Uploaded here:

http://www.savefile.com/files/4982248

Table 1 shows:
what the extra shot allowance should be per hole according to players h/cap
and the stroke index of each hole.

Table 2 is showing the formula results. Discrepencies being the blue figures.

Hope all this makes sense.
Thx
Kev



"Max" wrote:

> Typo in line:
> > .. Also keep the other 2 variables, par and the stroke indexes
> > unchanged to comparison...
>
> 2nd part should read:
> > unchanged to aid comparison...
>
> --
> Rgds
> Max
> xl 97
> ---
> GMT+8, 1° 22' N 103° 45' E
> xdemechanik <at>yahoo<dot>com
> ----
>
>
>

Hi!

I tried downloading your file from the link you posted but it didn't work.
Bad link?

I was able to download Max's file.....

Is that how your file is laid out?

UGH! <vbg>

I have a sample file that does what you want. Handles hdcps from 0 to 54 and
includes the modified Stableford scoring system.

Here's a link:

http://s43.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2...M05IB3HJHRNUJS

That link expires in 7 days or 25 DL's, whichever occurs first.

Biff

"kevhatch" <kevhatch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6CAEB260-39CE-4DD8-B5BA-29DA1238D4E4@microsoft.com...
> ok max, thx. sorry to be a pain.
> I have applied and tested the formula and found a few discrepencies.
> Uploaded here:
>
> http://www.savefile.com/files/4982248
>
> Table 1 shows:
> what the extra shot allowance should be per hole according to players
> h/cap
> and the stroke index of each hole.
>
> Table 2 is showing the formula results. Discrepencies being the blue
> figures.
>
> Hope all this makes sense.
> Thx
> Kev
>
>
>
> "Max" wrote:
>
>> Typo in line:
>> > .. Also keep the other 2 variables, par and the stroke indexes
>> > unchanged to comparison...
>>
>> 2nd part should read:
>> > unchanged to aid comparison...
>>
>> --
>> Rgds
>> Max
>> xl 97
>> ---
>> GMT+8, 1° 22' N 103° 45' E
>> xdemechanik <at>yahoo<dot>com
>> ----
>>
>>
>>

Thanks for the clarification, Kev. Ok, thought it more straightforward to
just use your Table 1 (the one with the correct shot allowances) as a
reference source, and revise the earlier formula in D6 to read the figures
direct from Table 1 instead, via an INDEX(...,MATCH(...),MATCH(...)).

Here's the revised sample file: http://www.savefile.com/files/7533806
File: GolfScoreCard_kevhatch_newusers_2.xls

The revised construct hence reads as:

Put in D6:
=IF(C6="",0,C6-INDEX(Chk!$A:$S,MATCH($B6,Chk!$A:$A,0),MATCH(C$4,Chk!$A$5:$S$
5,0)))

(revised formula in D6, Table 1 is in sheet: Chk)

Put in E6:
=IF(D6=0,0,IF(OR(C$3-D6<-1,C$3-D6>3),0,VLOOKUP(C$3-D6,{-1,1;0,2;1,3;2,4;3,5}
,2)))

(no change to formula in E6)

Select D6:E6 and copy / paste to G6:H6, J6:K6, M6:N6, P6:Q6, S6:T6, V6:W6,
Y6:Z6, AB6:AC6

Then just select D6:AD6 and fill down as many rows as required (Erase all
the dummy scores in row 6 first)

--
Rgds
Max
xl 97
---
GMT+8, 1° 22' N 103° 45' E
xdemechanik <at>yahoo<dot>com
----
"kevhatch" <kevhatch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6CAEB260-39CE-4DD8-B5BA-29DA1238D4E4@microsoft.com...
> ok max, thx. sorry to be a pain.
> I have applied and tested the formula and found a few discrepencies.
> Uploaded here:
>
> http://www.savefile.com/files/4982248
>
> Table 1 shows:
> what the extra shot allowance should be per hole according to players
h/cap
> and the stroke index of each hole.
>
> Table 2 is showing the formula results. Discrepencies being the blue
figures.
>
> Hope all this makes sense.
> Thx
> Kev

Thx Guys, excellent job. I'm learning..slowly!

"Max" wrote:

> Thanks for the clarification, Kev. Ok, thought it more straightforward to
> just use your Table 1 (the one with the correct shot allowances) as a
> reference source, and revise the earlier formula in D6 to read the figures
> direct from Table 1 instead, via an INDEX(...,MATCH(...),MATCH(...)).
>
> Here's the revised sample file: http://www.savefile.com/files/7533806
> File: GolfScoreCard_kevhatch_newusers_2.xls
>
> The revised construct hence reads as:
>
> Put in D6:
> =IF(C6="",0,C6-INDEX(Chk!$A:$S,MATCH($B6,Chk!$A:$A,0),MATCH(C$4,Chk!$A$5:$S$
> 5,0)))
>
> (revised formula in D6, Table 1 is in sheet: Chk)
>
> Put in E6:
> =IF(D6=0,0,IF(OR(C$3-D6<-1,C$3-D6>3),0,VLOOKUP(C$3-D6,{-1,1;0,2;1,3;2,4;3,5}
> ,2)))
>
> (no change to formula in E6)
>
> Select D6:E6 and copy / paste to G6:H6, J6:K6, M6:N6, P6:Q6, S6:T6, V6:W6,
> Y6:Z6, AB6:AC6
>
> Then just select D6:AD6 and fill down as many rows as required (Erase all
> the dummy scores in row 6 first)
>
> --
> Rgds
> Max
> xl 97
> ---
> GMT+8, 1° 22' N 103° 45' E
> xdemechanik <at>yahoo<dot>com
> ----
> "kevhatch" <kevhatch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:6CAEB260-39CE-4DD8-B5BA-29DA1238D4E4@microsoft.com...
> > ok max, thx. sorry to be a pain.
> > I have applied and tested the formula and found a few discrepencies.
> > Uploaded here:
> >
> > http://www.savefile.com/files/4982248
> >
> > Table 1 shows:
> > what the extra shot allowance should be per hole according to players
> h/cap
> > and the stroke index of each hole.
> >
> > Table 2 is showing the formula results. Discrepencies being the blue
> figures.
> >
> > Hope all this makes sense.
> > Thx
> > Kev
>
>
>

Glad to hear it worked !
Thanks for the feedback ..
--
Rgds
Max
xl 97
---
GMT+8, 1° 22' N 103° 45' E
xdemechanik <at>yahoo<dot>com
----
"kevhatch" <kevhatch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F1C32F5E-3A65-4833-8A2F-684F2EFDA6BA@microsoft.com...
> Thx Guys, excellent job. I'm learning..slowly!