LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
spursrule68 
I just converted my 2003 file to the 2010 version, and it went from 906kb to 330kb. On the face of it I can see no differences in loss of data/functions!
Is there a reason for this or will data have become lost somewhere? Thanks
I just converted my 2003 file to the 2010 version, and it went from 906kb to 330kb. On the face of it I can see no differences in loss of data/functions!
Is there a reason for this or will data have become lost somewhere? Thanks
the new .xlsx file format is a zipped file so you can see a reduction in file size, due to compression, for certain files.
wait, its currently .xslm. same applies?
awesome, thanks for the reply. A much improved version then!
.xlsm denotes the file contains macros.
more info on file formats.
http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/ex...464.aspx?CTT=1
all the new file types (xlsx, xlsm, xlsb, etc.) are all compressed types. xls could contain macros but xlsx cannot. That's why you would have to save as xlsm or xlsb.
Please consider:
Thanking those who helped you. Click the star icon in the lower left part of the contributor's post and add Reputation.
Cleaning up when you're done. Mark your thread [SOLVED] if you received your answer.
excellent. thanks guys
If you are satisfied with the responses then please mark the thread as solved.
Good luck.
abousetta
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Register To Reply
Bookmarks