Something like this:
Something like this:
Never use Merged Cells in Excel
Thats great!
Thanks guys!
I have tried to mimic the formula in cell R7 supplied by zbor, in R25
But can't seem to nail it
Anyone?
I’m still trying to finish this formula.
Just can’t seem to get over the line,
Can anyone help?
Not entirely sure I follow but perhaps the INDEX element you're looking for is along the lines of:
![]()
INDEX($D$25:$N$31,MATCH($R$5,$C$25:$C$31),MATCH($R$23,$D$24:$F$24,0)+($R$21-1)*3)
My Recommended Reading:
Volatility
Sumproduct & Arrays
Pivot Intro
Email from XL - VBA & Outlook VBA
Function Dictionary & Function Translations
Dynamic Named Ranges
Thanks for the help.
That’s allmost it, but it doesn't seem to quite work with land descriptions "2" and "3"
For example if I have a land description of "2" in cell R21 on the attached,
and a soil permeability of "medium" IN R23 - it should return a vale of "0.32" from cell "i25"
Any ideas?
I did not notice that you have an inconsistent number of columns in each sub table... (1) uses 3 columns [D:F], (2) [G:J] and (3) [K:N] both use 4 columns and merged cells (best avoided)
Goes without saying that a consistent layout generally simplifies the calculations.
Let me know if you are going to modify the tables so that they are consistent (advised - and this means removed the merged cells) or you intend to leave as they are.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks