Picking 5 highest/lowest numbers from a list

Wow, that's a monster, but it sure works!

Thank you so much!

Well, I found another loophole. In this new data set, with the new formula, it returns 1.33 (# 15) as the only RDA, when it should also grab the four # 4's, as that would still make a total of 5 RDA's. Make sense?

So if there was one more score of 4 in the scores, then I wouldn't use any of them, but since there are only four, plus the lower score, they can be used.