In article <uC6GleqoGHA.4192@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>,
"RagDyeR" <ragdyer@cutoutmsn.com> wrote:

> But the 99^99 performs exactly the same function (no larger XL number), and
> is easier to type.<bg>

Sure! In practice, it's not likely that data will contain a number
larger than 99^99. However, since it's theoretically possible... <bg>

Cheers!