+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Range of Factorial Function

Hybrid View

Guest Range of Factorial Function 09-16-2005, 10:05 AM
Guest Re: Range of Factorial... 09-16-2005, 11:05 AM
Guest Re: Range of Factorial... 09-16-2005, 12:05 PM
Guest Re: Range of Factorial... 09-16-2005, 11:05 AM
Guest Re: Range of Factorial... 09-16-2005, 12:05 PM
Guest Re: Range of Factorial... 09-16-2005, 12:05 PM
Guest Re: Range of Factorial... 09-16-2005, 08:05 PM
Guest Re: Range of Factorial... 09-16-2005, 08:05 PM
  1. #1
    Dana DeLouis
    Guest

    Re: Range of Factorial Function

    Oops. Didn't even think of this:

    =GAMMALN(229+1)

    1018.95850224964

    HTH :>)
    --
    Dana DeLouis
    Win XP & Office 2003


    "Dana DeLouis" <delouis@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
    news:OsRrjksuFHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
    > Hi. 229! has 443 digits in it, so it's too big for both the worksheet and
    > vba. (27! being the max in Vba)
    > Here's just one workaround:
    >
    > Function LogFactorial(n) As Double
    > Dim ans As Double
    > Dim j As Long
    > For j = 1 To n
    > ans = ans + Log(j)
    > Next j
    > LogFactorial = ans
    > End Function
    >
    > Test:
    > ? LogFactorial(229)
    > 1018.95850224969
    >
    > Which checks with another program:
    >
    > Log[229!]
    > 1018.9585022496902
    >
    > HTH ;>)
    > --
    > Dana DeLouis
    > Win XP & Office 2003
    >
    >
    > "Rushi" <Rushi@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
    > news:9A23F286-6249-4107-95BF-0E7ACE92E2AC@microsoft.com...
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> For some analysis I am doing, I tried the following LOG(FACT(229)), and
    >> it
    >> returned NUM!. I am wondering if 229 is too big a number to compute a
    >> Factorial of ? If so, is there an upper limit (something like FACT
    >> function
    >> can be applied for numbers <= 150) for the FACT function ?
    >>
    >> Thanks in anticipation,
    >>
    >> Rushi Patel

    >
    >




  2. #2
    Bernie Deitrick
    Guest

    Re: Range of Factorial Function

    Since he wanted LOG not LN,

    =GAMMALN(229+1)/LN(10)

    Bernie

    > Oops. Didn't even think of this:


    I'm impressed....



+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 1