Everything that I read says that Excel 2003 doesnt need a converter ... but
I cant open a .123 file...
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated...
jason
Everything that I read says that Excel 2003 doesnt need a converter ... but
I cant open a .123 file...
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated...
jason
Jason B [MVP-Storage] wrote...
>Everything that I read says that Excel 2003 doesnt need a converter
.... but
>I cant open a .123 file...
>
>Any ideas would be greatly appreciated...
Whatever you're reading, either you're not reading it carefully or it
was written sloppily. Excel from version 95 on has been able to read
..WK4 (Lotus 123 Release 4 format) files and *PREVIOUS* 123 file formats
(.WK3/.WK1/.WKS), but *NO* version of Excel yet has been able to read
..123 (123 97 and 123 release 9.x) format files.
Aside from hex editors, the **ONLY** software packages that can do
anything useful with .123 files at this time are Lotus 123 Releases 97
and 9.x, Quattro Pro version 10 (WordPerfect Office 2002) and later,
and (claimed, but I haven't verified) DataViz's ConversionPlus. Of all
of these, 123 does the best job with them (no surprise).
So unless you can get whoever sent you this file/these files to resave
them in .XLS format and send you the .XLS files, you're going to have
to buy and install the latest version of Lotus SmartSuite (WPO may be
cheaper, but it's certain to be buggier, and ConversionPlus will be
much more expensive) if you want to do anything with these files.
Thanks Harlan ...
"Harlan Grove" <hrlngrv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1110824353.331232.56840@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Jason B [MVP-Storage] wrote...
> >Everything that I read says that Excel 2003 doesnt need a converter
> ... but
> >I cant open a .123 file...
> >
> >Any ideas would be greatly appreciated...
>
> Whatever you're reading, either you're not reading it carefully or it
> was written sloppily. Excel from version 95 on has been able to read
> .WK4 (Lotus 123 Release 4 format) files and *PREVIOUS* 123 file formats
> (.WK3/.WK1/.WKS), but *NO* version of Excel yet has been able to read
> .123 (123 97 and 123 release 9.x) format files.
>
> Aside from hex editors, the **ONLY** software packages that can do
> anything useful with .123 files at this time are Lotus 123 Releases 97
> and 9.x, Quattro Pro version 10 (WordPerfect Office 2002) and later,
> and (claimed, but I haven't verified) DataViz's ConversionPlus. Of all
> of these, 123 does the best job with them (no surprise).
>
> So unless you can get whoever sent you this file/these files to resave
> them in .XLS format and send you the .XLS files, you're going to have
> to buy and install the latest version of Lotus SmartSuite (WPO may be
> cheaper, but it's certain to be buggier, and ConversionPlus will be
> much more expensive) if you want to do anything with these files.
>
Excel cannot open a *.123 file. You will need to resave the file (in Lotus) as a *.wk4 or *.wks file. Then Excel can open it. Better yet, when in Lotus, save it as .xls file, I believe that option is available.
Many formulas, formats, VBA codes, etc. may not translate as expected.
Good Luck.
Bruce
Bruce
The older I get, the better I used to be.
USA
I found Lotus Smart Suite for $21. I needed it to convert some Ami Pro
files to Word. Here's a Link.
http://www.directdeals.com/Item_CD-AN01DIE.aspx
-- Carlos
"Jason B [MVP-Storage]" <jasonbuffington@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%232ytBdLKFHA.1308@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Everything that I read says that Excel 2003 doesnt need a converter ...
> but
> I cant open a .123 file...
>
> Any ideas would be greatly appreciated...
>
> jason
>
>
I've not tried this yet, but...
OpenOffice.org 2.0 Office Suite
"...The Lotus 1-2-3 import now also loads files of Lotus versions up to 9.7
...."
(about 1/2 way down the page)
http://marketing.openoffice.org/2.0/...teroperability
HTH
--
Dana DeLouis
Win XP & Office 2003
"Jason B [MVP-Storage]" <jasonbuffington@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u7pkBiMKFHA.2936@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Harlan ...
>
>
>
> "Harlan Grove" <hrlngrv@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1110824353.331232.56840@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>> Jason B [MVP-Storage] wrote...
>> >Everything that I read says that Excel 2003 doesnt need a converter
>> ... but
>> >I cant open a .123 file...
>> >
>> >Any ideas would be greatly appreciated...
>>
>> Whatever you're reading, either you're not reading it carefully or it
>> was written sloppily. Excel from version 95 on has been able to read
>> .WK4 (Lotus 123 Release 4 format) files and *PREVIOUS* 123 file formats
>> (.WK3/.WK1/.WKS), but *NO* version of Excel yet has been able to read
>> .123 (123 97 and 123 release 9.x) format files.
>>
>> Aside from hex editors, the **ONLY** software packages that can do
>> anything useful with .123 files at this time are Lotus 123 Releases 97
>> and 9.x, Quattro Pro version 10 (WordPerfect Office 2002) and later,
>> and (claimed, but I haven't verified) DataViz's ConversionPlus. Of all
>> of these, 123 does the best job with them (no surprise).
>>
>> So unless you can get whoever sent you this file/these files to resave
>> them in .XLS format and send you the .XLS files, you're going to have
>> to buy and install the latest version of Lotus SmartSuite (WPO may be
>> cheaper, but it's certain to be buggier, and ConversionPlus will be
>> much more expensive) if you want to do anything with these files.
>>
>
>
Dana DeLouis wrote...
>I've not tried this yet, but...
>
>OpenOffice.org 2.0 Office Suite
> "...The Lotus 1-2-3 import now also loads files of Lotus versions up
to 9.7
>..."
....
OOo 2.0 is still in beta. I've been using it for a few months, but I
hadn't noticed this feature. It works for VERY SIMPLE .123 files, but
is nowhere near ready for prime time. One of the more annoying things
is that it can't handle multiple worksheets in .123 files. It
invariably names the first worksheet Sheet1 and *ALL* subsequent
worksheets temp. However, if the file the OP has contains only a single
worksheet or nothing but constants and formulas referring to ranges
only in the same worksheet, it may be adequate to extract the data.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks