Well, they work, sort of...yes, searching for the character "*" because it identifies a certain type of record in the raw, exported data. Depending on how many "*" there are, tells you the type of data. But, they aren't picking up the entire field in exported, raw data.
This excel macro file supposedly takes a text file and massages the raw data, which was exported from our financial system (an SAP ERP), then the macro saves the raw data, after massage, as an Excel file. Which is then run thru an MS Access macro, which further massages the data, (picking up some detailed information by matching fields in tables already set up in Access).
Then, at the last, there is a pivot table excel file, that is supposed to show you your data in whatever manner you wish, depending on how you set up the pivot table. The Sum fields are already set, the end user just brings down the data fields that uniquely identify the summed amounts.
Not that it matters but I work as a Financial Analyst for the Government, so that should tell you the importance of what I am trying to do, and I am not trying to influence anyone, was just stating my position and why I am asking these questions.
We were given these tools by a vendor at a conference and I am, (since I am the only Finanacial Analyst where I work that used to be a Software Engineer, but its been a long time since I have done any programming), tasked with seeing if these tools can help us in reporting the Status of the Funds allocated to us by Congress.
The two lines in question are part of a macro:
No, I don't expect anyone to plow through that listing, nor make any changes to it, I am just trying to understand why those lines are not getting all of the data in the field. Since this is the first macro that hits the raw data, it has to happen here, because it is present before this macro, and gone afterwards...
Thanks.
Bookmarks