+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

IRR Calculation issues

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    joeu2004@hotmail.com
    Guest

    Re: IRR Calculation issues

    Mac6668 wrote:
    > I would appreciate it if someone can explain why the IRR
    > function calculation computes erratically on a MS Excel
    > 2003 SP1 spreadsheet. If you reduce the numerical value
    > in cell C4 to 77.9 % of its current value, the worksheet will
    > calculate. At 78% of its value it returns "#NUM! ; and
    > at 78.2% it calculates; and at 78.3% it returns "#DIV/0!"


    Did you read the Help text for the IRR function?

    It explains that one reason for #NUM! is that the IRR function
    could not determine the rate within 0.00001% (1E-7) within
    20 iterations of its internal algorithm.

    The solution is to enter an appropriate "guess" (last IRR
    argument) other than 10%. Unfortunately, there is no guidance
    about what is "appropriate". In another thread, I believe
    someone suggested that -10% (or was it -0.1%?) always(?)
    works. I am probably wrong about those details. Search for
    the thread.

    I discovered that one reason for #DIV/0! is that the IRR
    function reached a divide-by-zero condition internally before
    reaching 20 iterations. Empirically, I learned that the solution
    is the same as for #NUM!, namely: enter an appropriate
    "guess".

    Of course, the might be other possible explanations for the
    #NUM! and #DIV/0! errors, which could be your fault. But
    since your IRR() formula works some of the time, I am
    inclined to suspect that you need an appropriate "guess".


  2. #2
    joeu2004@hotmail.com
    Guest

    Re: IRR Calculation issues

    I wrote:
    > The solution is to enter an appropriate "guess" (last IRR
    > argument) other than 10%. Unfortunately, there is no guidance
    > about what is "appropriate". In another thread, I believe
    > someone suggested that -10% (or was it -0.1%?) always(?)
    > works. I am probably wrong about those details. Search for
    > the thread.


    I found it. In another thread in m.p.e.worksheet.functions,
    Harlan Grove (11/4/2005 3:19p PST) suggests using -0.9 (-90%).

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 1