Very nice. Is that what Frenchmen call it, or is that just Microsoft's
unique translation?
- Jon
-------
Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
Peltier Technical Services
Tutorials and Custom Solutions
http://PeltierTech.com/
_______
"Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:488EE8AA-FC5E-482F-B784-2429873D2F7F@microsoft.com...
> Jon and Jerry,
>
> I've found the XY (Scatter)! In a french version it is called "Nuages de
> points" (Clouds of dots). Very poetic isn't it?
>
> Thanks to both of you.
>
> Jan M.
>
>
>
> "Jon Peltier" wrote:
>
>> What Jerry means is don't use a column chart. It is the wrong kind of
>> chart
>> to use to show relationships between two variables, even if you are not
>> trying to generate statistics on it. Rebuild the chart and select one of
>> the
>> XY subtypes in step 1 of the chart wizard, or convert the chart using
>> Chart
>> Type on the Chart menu. There's no need to mess around with the data
>> range.
>>
>> - Jon
>> -------
>> Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
>> Peltier Technical Services
>> Tutorials and Custom Solutions
>> http://PeltierTech.com/
>> _______
>>
>> "Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:F53C98AA-0D52-4238-B05C-8139A27C7B3E@microsoft.com...
>> > Jerry,
>> >
>> > I think I've figured out what your meant by "xy scatter"!
>> > I modified my data table the following way and got the right results:
>> >
>> > X Y
>> > 73 6.6
>> > 74
>> > 75
>> > 76
>> > 77
>> > 78 5.8
>> > ... ...
>> >
>> > Thanks for your help.
>> >
>> > Jan M.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Jerry W. Lewis" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.
>> >>
>> >> When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel that
>> >> your
>> >> x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you provided
>> >> for
>> >> the
>> >> x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have numeric
>> >> values.
>> >> Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a
>> >> mystery to
>> >> me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly
>> >> calculates
>> >> the regression of y against those assumed x-values.
>> >>
>> >> Jerry
>> >>
>> >> "Jan M." wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
>> >> >
>> >> > X Y
>> >> > 73 6.6
>> >> > 78 5.7
>> >> > 86 4.8
>> >> >
>> >> > The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
>> >> > respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which
>> >> > seems good
>> >> > enough to me.
>> >> >
>> >> > Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the
>> >> > following
>> >> > equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a
>> >> > rounding
>> >> > problem)!!!
>> >> >
>> >> > The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up
>> >> > with
>> >> > the
>> >> > right equation???
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > Jan M.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>>
>>
>>
Bookmarks